Germany is a party to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) and the Nagoya Protocol. In addition, there are legal, administrative and political frameworks and measures that are reported via the online reporting system for compliance with the International Treaty on PGRFA or via the ABS Clearing House.

Selection

Please select here what should be displayed in the chart and/or the table.

Download Headline CSV Download Source CSV

Anzahl der Staaten, die rechtliche, administrative und politische Rahmenbedingungen geschaffen haben, um Vorteile gerecht und gleichmäßig zu verteilen
Year Value Units Series
2010 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2011 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2012 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2013 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2014 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2015 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2016 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2017 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2018 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2019 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2020 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2021 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2022 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2023 1.0 yes=1, no=0 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
2010 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2011 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2012 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2013 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2014 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2015 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2016 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2017 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2018 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2019 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2020 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2021 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2022 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2023 1.0 yes=1, no=0 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
2010 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2011 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2012 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2013 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2014 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2015 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2016 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2017 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2018 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2019 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2020 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2021 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2022 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2023 1.0 yes=1, no=0 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
2010 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2011 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2012 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2013 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2014 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2015 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2016 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2017 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2018 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2019 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2020 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2021 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2022 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2023 1.0 yes=1, no=0 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
2010 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2011 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2012 3898.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2013 5012.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2014 6068.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2015 7292.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2016 8347.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2017 8728.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2018 9120.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2019 9711.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2020 10239.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2021 10797.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2022 11332.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
2023 11821.0 Number 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany

Data source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Geographic coverage: Germany

This overview contains information on the time series shown that are available in Germany and their compliance with the UN metadata. The national metadata contains supplementary methodological and country-specific information.

Time series available
  • 1) Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on PGRFA
  • 2) Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
  • 3) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on PGRFA
  • 4) Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the ABS Clearing-House
  • 5) Total reported number of SMTAs transferring PGRFA to Germany
Compliance with the UN metadata

The time series are compliant with the UN metadata.
National metadata Metadata on the presented time series opens in a new window
Data state

2024/04/25

This overview contains information on the metadata of the SDG indicator shown, as defined by the United Nations Statistical Commission. The complete UN metadata is provided by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD).

Target

Promote fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and promote appropriate access to such resources, as internationally agreed
Indicator name

Number of countries that have adopted legislative, administrative and policy frameworks to ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits
Tier category Tier I opens in a new window
UN custodian agency

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD-Secretariat)
Link to UN metadata Metadata on this indicator opens in a new window